Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPop, Anita
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-19T17:47:38Z
dc.date.available2021-08-19T17:47:38Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-19T17:47:38Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/80697
dc.descriptionUrban erasure, as a result of tabula rasa redevelopments and the privatization of public spaces within London, are wiping out the idiosyncratic imprints of the city’s inhabitants. Through unfolding the power of ephemeral urbanism, the thesis aims to reimagine alternative concepts of public space in which acts of civic participation can occur, in order to reclaim the city. The notions of the Static and Kinetic City, first conceived of by Mehrotra, serve as a fundamental framing device for this thesis. Intending to extend this theory beyond the adaptive reuse of existing elements, the thesis proposes a series of architectural interfaces to facilitate a unified urbanism, celebrating the strengths of both static and kinetic facets. Allocating space for the production of urban commons, these interfaces allow interventions to plug-in and morph, allowing the public to create an ever-changing fabric of indeterminacy, aiming to improve of the power of the urban experience.en_US
dc.description.abstractUrban erasure, as a result of tabula rasa redevelopments and the privatization of public spaces within London, are wiping out the idiosyncratic imprints of the city’s inhabitants. Through unfolding the power of ephemeral urbanism, the thesis aims to reimagine alternative concepts of public space in which acts of civic participation can occur, in order to reclaim the city. The notions of the Static and Kinetic City, first conceived of by Mehrotra, serve as a fundamental framing device for this thesis. Intending to extend this theory beyond the adaptive reuse of existing elements, the thesis proposes a series of architectural interfaces to facilitate a unified urbanism, celebrating the strengths of both static and kinetic facets. Allocating space for the production of urban commons, these interfaces allow interventions to plug-in and morph, allowing the public to create an ever-changing fabric of indeterminacy, aiming to improve of the power of the urban experience.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectArchitectureen_US
dc.subjectEphemeral Urbanismen_US
dc.subjectIndeterminacyen_US
dc.subjectTemporalen_US
dc.subjectPublic Spaceen_US
dc.subjectUrban Erasureen_US
dc.subjectNeoliberalismen_US
dc.subjectLondon, UKen_US
dc.titleImprints of the Everyday: Architecture for Incremental Interventionsen_US
dc.date.defence2021-06-14
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Architectureen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Architectureen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerNichole Wiedemannen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorSteve Parcellen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerJames Forrenen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorSusan Fitzgeralden_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record