Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEarl, Kaleb
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-18T12:50:06Z
dc.date.available2015-08-18T12:50:06Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/60351
dc.description.abstractBoth Simone Weil and Ludwig Wittgenstein hold mysticism—i.e., the belief in something utterly transcendent—centrally. The mysticism present in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico- Philosophicus presents a problem: if “the mystical” is a “deep” nonsense, and there is something important that cannot be sensibly presented in language, we are left in an undesirable situation. The mystical is taken to be of paramount importance, but is ultimately inaccessible to reason. Weil, starting with political and theological considerations, arrives at a similar problem. A mystical position yields the “problem of mysticism”: There is the mystical; it is of crucial importance, and it is inaccessible to our reason. Weil’s mystical praxis of decreation is a solution to the problem. This does not present a way that we can come to the mystical, but a way that we can become aware of its revelation, which bypasses our reason.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectLudwig Wittgensteinen_US
dc.subjectSimone Weilen_US
dc.subjectMysticismen_US
dc.subjectIneffabilityen_US
dc.titleEffing the Ineffable: The Mysticism of Simone Weil and Ludwig Wittgensteinen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.date.defence2015-08-14
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinern/aen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorLetitia Meynellen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerSteven Burnsen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerMichael Hymersen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDuncan MacIntoshen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record