Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGalbraith, Justine
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-15T15:57:49Z
dc.date.available2014-12-15T15:57:49Z
dc.date.issued2014-12-15
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/56012
dc.description.abstractAn unperturbed piece of glass is optically isotropic. Birefringence can be induced by breaking this symmetry, for example by applying a uniaxial stress to the glass. An empirical model exists which predicts when oxide glasses will exhibit positive, negative or zero birefringence under stress. This model has been used to determined new zero-stress optic oxide glass compositions; however, it has not been tested on non-oxide systems, nor does it take into account the wavelength of the incident light. The stress-optic response in chalcogenide glasses was investigated using stoichiometric GeS2-P2S5 and GeS2-Sb2S3, and non-stoichiometric Ge-P-S. The trends of the stress-optic response in stoichiometric non-oxide glasses correlated well with predictions based on the empirical model for oxide glasses. Small differences between the predictive parameter of the model, ⟨d/Nc⟩, were explained by expanding the treatment of metallicity. The wavelength dependence of the stress-optic coefficient for a large variety of oxide glass formers and modifiers was measured. Glasses composed of positive modifiers (e.g. BaO, CaO, Na2O) exhibited positive dispersion of the stress-optic coefficient, while those with negative modifiers (e.g. PbO, SnO) showed negative dispersion. Mixing positive and negative modifiers in a glass resulted in compositions exhibiting wavelength-independent stress-optic coefficients. The photoelastic response of a material can also be described by its elasto-optic tensor (pij). Isotropic materials have three elasto-optic tensor elements, two of which are independent. These two independent elements were measured for lead and barium borate, phosphate and silicate glasses using Brillouin spectroscopy. Both elements were found to correlate with the empirical parameter ⟨d/Nc⟩, while the third, dependent element showed no relationship to the empirical model. Finally, an alternative model of photoelasticity is discussed. The normalized polarizability of a material is found to correlate with both the sign and magnitude of the stress-optic coefficient.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectGlassen_US
dc.subjectPhotoelasticityen_US
dc.subjectBrillouin scatteringen_US
dc.subjectEllipsometryen_US
dc.titlePhotoelastic properties of oxide and non-oxide glassesen_US
dc.date.defence2014-12-12
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Physics & Atmospheric Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerLiping Huangen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorKevin Hewitten_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerKimberley Hallen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerKevin Hewitten_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorJosef Zwanzigeren_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsYesen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseYesen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record