Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorQuadir, Fahimul.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-21T12:33:53Z
dc.date.available1999
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier.otherAAINQ49285en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/55667
dc.descriptionGiven the global transitions to liberal democracy and the free market, this dissertation examines the prevalent assumption that political democratization and economic liberalization are mutually reinforcing processes. More specifically, it explores the complementary dynamic between democracy and the market within the changing political economy of Bangladesh. It also analyzes the role of civil society, including NGOs, in sustainable democratic development in the next millennium.en_US
dc.descriptionOutlining some of the contradictions generated by structural economic reforms, this study suggests that, instead of creating the conditions for democratic consolidation, economic liberalization is likely to undermine the future of constitutional democracy. It finds that, while market reform programs usually create pressures for democratization, they can equally upset the hope of institutionalizing democracy in places where and times when the costs and benefits of economic reforms are distributed disproportionately.en_US
dc.descriptionAs well, this research raises question about the popular assumption that civil society acts as a key force for democracy and development. It holds that both the role and meaning of civil society depend on particular socio-political contexts. This dissertation also argues that, although civil society is expected to protect and promote popular interests, an overly politicized civil society could actually weaken the process of democratization and development.en_US
dc.descriptionSimilarly, this dissertation casts profound doubts on the widely held belief that NGOs enable disadvantaged groups, particularly women, to be empowered in a sustainable manner. It argues that, due to their excessive reliance on foreign funds, development NGOs may focus more on fulfilling the requirements of their major donors than on grassroots democratization, development and empowerment of the poor. The inability of most development NGOs to adopt internal democratic practices also significantly reduces their capability to promote democracy and development at the grassroots. Therefore, this study cautiously concludes that the process of giving people a right to shape their own destinies is a complex, protracted and even problematic one.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph.D.)--Dalhousie University (Canada), 1999.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherDalhousie Universityen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.subjectPolitical Science, General.en_US
dc.subjectSociology, Social Structure and Development.en_US
dc.titleDemocracy, development and civil society in Bangladesh: The quest for a new praxis for sustainability.en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.contributor.degreePh.D.en_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record