Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorArsenault, Brian
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T17:43:57Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T17:43:57Z
dc.date.issued2012-08-29
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/15422
dc.description.abstractThe following is an attempt to ground personal duty – duty which is both believed and felt by all agents. To do this, I look at two contrasting attempts. The first is a rationalist attempt, which tries to ground it in conceptual necessity, the second an empiricist one, which uses empirical fact as its basis. In particular, it uses contingent facts about the things which are agents (people, for example), and what makes them feel a sense of duty. I argue that, ultimately, it is this type of grounding of duty which can be successful. Throughout, I emphasize two crucial points. The first is the freedom of the individual; the second is that duty is not a "want" or "desire;" rather, it is quite often what one does against one's own wants or desires. I argue that a paradigmatic example of establishing duty is Harry Frankfurt's theory of autonomous love.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectdutyen_US
dc.subjectnormativityen_US
dc.subjectfreedomen_US
dc.subjectskepticismen_US
dc.subjectloveen_US
dc.subjectKorsgaarden_US
dc.subjectFrankfurten_US
dc.subjectdesireen_US
dc.titleDuties of a Free Personen_US
dc.date.defence2012-08-24
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerChike Jeffersen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorMichael Hymersen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerGreg Scherkoskeen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDuncan MacIntoshen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record