A Reply to Geoffrey Greif
dc.contributor.author | Ungar, Michael | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-03-25T18:18:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-03-25T18:18:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003-06 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Replies to Geoffrey L. Greif's (2003) critique of the author's (2002) deeper ecological approach toward conducting social work. Greif's perception of Carol Meyer's & Edgar Auerswald's work as important for associating ecological models with systems theory is supported; however, it is argued that Greif fails to comprehend the author's attempt to develop a social ecological model of social work practice that is not based upon systems theory. It is asserted that systems-based ecological paradigms for performing social work ultimately create dichotomies between clients & social workers. Three principles that should guide the creation of future ecological models for social work practice are stated, eg, the significance of cooperation & mutuality. Indeed, it is claimed that several social work theorists have called for an ecological social work perspective that acknowledges the connection between the well-being of one's physical surroundings & one's psychological & social health. 4 References. J. W. Parker | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Ungar, Michael. 2003. "A Reply to Geoffrey Greif." Social Service Review 77(2): 309-311. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0037-7961 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 309 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10222/46244 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 77 | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Social Service Review | en_US |
dc.title | A Reply to Geoffrey Greif | en_US |
dc.type | Text | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Reply_Unger.pdf
- Size:
- 32.26 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: