A MULTI-METHOD EXAMINATION OF PARTNERSHIPS IN KNOWLEDGE MOBILIZATION FOR PEDIATRIC PAIN

Abstract

Knowledge mobilization (KM) activities are critical in pediatric pain management where knowledge to action gaps are prevalent; however, how to engage different partners in KM is not well understood. This dissertation sought to understand how to engage different partners in KM activities within pediatric pain. In Study 1, a needs assessment with researchers, knowledge users, and patients/caregivers identified challenges accessing evidence regarding pediatric pain, with unique needs to overcome barriers. Using qualitative methods, Study 2 generated four meta-themes to describe what health professionals, researchers, and patients/caregivers perceived as supporting engagement in KM (i.e., team dynamics, role of leadership, policy influence, social influence). Study 3, a best worst scaling experiment, examined partners’ priorities to support KM engagement. Relationship items were more important, while pragmatic items were less important. Partners share priorities to support partnerships, yet nuances must be considered to ensure partners are meaningfully engaged when mobilizing knowledge about pediatric pain.