Repository logo

Exploring the Competing Dual Roles of Mad, Mentally Ill, and neurodivergent (MMIND) Social Workers

dc.contributor.authorGulliver, Meghan
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicable
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Social Work
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Social Work
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalReceived
dc.contributor.external-examinerDr. Brenda LeFrançois
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicable
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Brenda Beagan
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDr. Marjorie Johnstone
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-25T12:26:59Z
dc.date.available2025-08-25T12:26:59Z
dc.date.defence2025-08-08
dc.date.issued2025-08-15
dc.descriptionClinical social workers who identify as Mad, Mentally Ill, or Neurodivergent (MMIND) occupy dual roles of both peer and professional. MMIND social workers uphold the professional role as members of a regulated profession which demands educational and employment credentials in order to be successful in attaining their position. MMIND social workers are also peers in that their experiences of psychiatrization, sanism, and neuroableism may be parallel to those of their ‘clients’ or ‘service users.’ These dual roles create tension as the MMIND social worker upholds a system that simultaneously oppresses them. The study implemented interpretive phenomenological analysis to illuminate the experiences of MMIND social workers employed in mental health practice contexts. The author’s insider knowledge as a Mad social worker employed in mental health practice aided in the analysis of the data. The study demonstrated that participants engaged in invisible labour not required of non-MMIND colleagues.
dc.description.abstractClinical social workers who identify as Mad, Mentally Ill, or Neurodivergent (MMIND) occupy dual roles of both peer and professional. MMIND social workers uphold the professional role as members of a regulated profession which demands educational and employment credentials in order to be successful in attaining their position. MMIND social workers are also peers in that their experiences of psychiatrization, sanism, and neuroableism may be parallel to those of their ‘clients’ or ‘service users.’ These dual roles create tension as the MMIND social worker upholds a system that simultaneously oppresses them. The study implemented interpretive phenomenological analysis to illuminate the experiences of MMIND social workers employed in mental health practice contexts. The author’s insider knowledge as a Mad social worker employed in mental health practice aided in the analysis of the data. The study demonstrated that participants engaged in invisible labour not required of non-MMIND colleagues.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10222/85381
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectMad
dc.subjectMentally Ill
dc.subjectNeurodivergence
dc.subjectEpistemic Injustice
dc.subjectMad Studies
dc.subjectNeurodiversity
dc.titleExploring the Competing Dual Roles of Mad, Mentally Ill, and neurodivergent (MMIND) Social Workers

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MeghanGulliver2025.pdf
Size:
917.09 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.12 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: