Repository logo

Explaining Multisystem Resilience in Undergraduate Students: A Mixed Method Research of Academic Stressors, Multi-Protective Factors, Cultural Systems, and Student Engagement

dc.contributor.authorWedyaswari, Miryam
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicable
dc.contributor.degreeDoctor of Philosophy
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Health
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalReceived
dc.contributor.external-examinerDr. Hendriati Agustiani
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicable
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Bagus Takwin
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. rer.nat. Wilis Srisayekti
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Retno Hanggarani Ninin
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Surya Cahyadi
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDr. Michael Ungar
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDr. Zahrotur Rusyda Hinduan
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-14T17:18:15Z
dc.date.available2026-04-14T17:18:15Z
dc.date.defence2026-04-07
dc.date.issued2026-04-13
dc.descriptionThe dissertation becomes the starting point for establishing my life mission by introducing social-ecological frameworks of multisystemic resilience in the context of Indonesian undergraduate students. Chapter 1 describes why I chose this topic as my PhD research. Chapter 2 explains the conceptualization of multisystemic resilience in the context of higher education and the research framework. Chapter 3 breaks down the research process, starting from the choices of research paradigms to the execution of an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. Chapter 4 presents the findings of the quantitative strand, followed by the qualitative strands. Finally, Chapter 5 provides a mix of findings and integrated discussion, as well as strengths, limitations, future direction, and conclusion. I describe the outline at the beginning of each chapter. I encourage you to read the first to third paragraphs to understand how each chapter proceeds.
dc.description.abstractThis sequential explanatory mixed-methods study examines multisystemic resilience among Indonesian undergraduates (n=920). Quantitative analysis reveals that healthy lifestyles, psychological resilience, social-ecological resilience, and institutional support fully mediate the relationship between academic stress and student engagement. High stress does not impair engagement if these four protective factors are adequate. Although religious and cultural identities correlate with protective factors, they do not moderate the stress-engagement path. Qualitative data from 12 students across four resilience profiles emphasize the roles of experiential learning, the "courage to connect," and fostering environments. Findings suggest religious beliefs and internalized parental values function as cultural systems that shape students' mindsets and coping strategies. Ultimately, resilience is a dynamic, multisystemic process influenced by internal meaning systems and external supports. These results offer critical implications for individual interventions, resilience-based instructional design, and nationwide institutional policy in higher education.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10222/85977
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectcultural systems
dc.subjectmultisystemic resilience
dc.subjectsocial-ecological framework
dc.subjectundergraduate students
dc.subjectstudent engagement
dc.subjectacademic stressor
dc.titleExplaining Multisystem Resilience in Undergraduate Students: A Mixed Method Research of Academic Stressors, Multi-Protective Factors, Cultural Systems, and Student Engagement

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MiryamWedyaswari2026.pdf
Size:
2.3 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.12 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: