5G and China-US Relations: Competition and Intervention
dc.contributor.author | Gong, Xinyu | |
dc.contributor.copyright-release | Not Applicable | en_US |
dc.contributor.degree | Master of Arts | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Political Science | en_US |
dc.contributor.ethics-approval | Not Applicable | en_US |
dc.contributor.external-examiner | n/a | en_US |
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinator | Kristin Good | en_US |
dc.contributor.manuscripts | Not Applicable | en_US |
dc.contributor.thesis-reader | Ruben Zaiotti | en_US |
dc.contributor.thesis-reader | Leah Sarson | en_US |
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisor | Brian Bow | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-08-31T18:42:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-08-31T18:42:45Z | |
dc.date.defence | 2021-08-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-08-31T18:42:45Z | |
dc.description.abstract | This study discusses the reasons that drive the US government to deviate from its private sector-dominated approach and implement state intervention in the competition with China over 5G. In order to better understand the reasons why the US sometimes intervenes in the market to gain a competitive advantage with respect to specific technologies, I examined and compared two case studies: the US response to competition with Japan over semiconductors in the 1980s, and the US response to competition with China over 5G in the 2010s and early 2020s. I argue that first, the US will intervene in the market to secure its technological advantage when it is outcompeted by foreign competitors; second, the US regards China as a strategic adversary, 5G gives China important economic and military advantages, therefore, the US government deviated from the free-market approach in order to maintain its strategic advantage. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10222/80790 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | International Relations | en_US |
dc.subject | China-US Relations | en_US |
dc.subject | 5G | en_US |
dc.subject | State Intervention | en_US |
dc.title | 5G and China-US Relations: Competition and Intervention | en_US |