Repository logo
 

A New Measure of Mnemonic Discrimination Applicable to Recognition Memory Tests with Continuous Variation in Novel Stimulus Interference

Date

2024-08-12

Authors

Leger, Simon

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Background: Mnemonic discrimination (MD) involves distinguishing new stimuli from memories of highly similar “lure” items or events, and is a putative indirect probe of dentate gyrus functioning. MD is impaired in the elderly and in individuals with hippocampal lesions, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and Alzheimer’s disease. The gold-standard MD test, called the mnemonic similarity task (MST), is rarely used in clinical research. We thus aimed to demonstrate convergent validity between the MST’s MD measure and a novel analysis method that extracts informa- tion about MD that could be used in widely clinically used recognition memory tests that do not have categorical distinctions between “lures” and “foils.” Methods: By fitting a logistic function to the relationship between stimulus inter- ference and the probability of classifying a stimulus as novel, at the single participant level, we derived participant-level indices of MD (λ) and overall recognition memory performance (∆). We applied the novel measures to MST data from two indepen- dent datasets (N=18; N=67), and to synthetic MST data. Using linear mixed-effects modelling, we sought to confirm that λ predicts the MST’s lure discrimination index (LDI), while ∆ predicts the MST’s overall recognition memory index (REC). Results: Across all datasets, λ predicted LDI (β=0.76, 95% CI [0.62-0.91], p<0.001), but not REC (β=0.06, 95% CI [-0.03-0.15], p=0197), while ∆ predicted REC (β=0.93, 95% CI [0.83-1.02], p<0.001), but not LDI (β=-0.06, 95% CI [-0.20-0.09], p=0.438). The λ and ∆ indices were not correlated. Simulations suggest that λ may be more robustly estimated in participants with stronger overall recognition performance. Conclusion: Our novel measure accurately indexes MD, without correlating with overall recognition memory performance. Future studies should apply it to large clinical datasets with widely used recognition memory tests.

Description

Keywords

Recognition Memory, Mnemonic Discrimination, Mnemonic Similarity Task, MST

Citation