Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShapiro, Jared
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-29T14:44:14Z
dc.date.available2023-08-29T14:44:14Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-28
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/82859
dc.descriptionWe leveraged optogenetics in mouse V1 to investigate whether network activity or connectivity affect post-photostimulation rebound effects in this circuit. We coupled differing levels of bottom-up visual stimulation of mouse V1 with photostimulation of Pvalb+, SOM+, or VIP+ interneurons separately to address these two questions. We collected data from 3 separate experiments using different visual stimuli and/or photostimulation protocols. We found converging evidence that coupling interneuron photostimulation with visual stimuli producing the strongest V1 responses also produced stronger rebound effects that were more prevalent across Pyr cell and interneuron populations. Importantly, Pyr cell and interneuron rebound effects differed in directionality and timing. We also report rebound effects were strongest and most prevalent when we coupled visual stimuli with Pvalb+ photostimulation rather than activating SOM+ or VIP+ interneurons. Overall, these results provide insight on experimental paradigms most conducive for producing optogenetic-mediated rebound effects in mouse V1, including coupling strong bottom-up visual stimulation with optogenetic activation of Pvalb+ cells in this circuit.en_US
dc.description.abstractCortical circuits comprise excitatory pyramidal (Pyr) cells and inhibitory interneurons that work together to perform neural computations. Optogenetic studies in mouse primary visual cortex (V1) have focused on (i) sketching the connectivity between Pyr cells and distinct interneuron subtypes that express parvalbumin (Pvalb+), somatostatin (SOM+) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP+), and (ii) examining how photostimulating these inhibitory interneuron subtypes shape Pyr cell receptive field properties. Rebound effects have been reported after the optogenetic light source is turned off, but no systematic analysis of rebounds has been performed. Here, we sought to characterize optogenetic-mediated rebound effects and investigate whether network features like V1 activity and connectivity can affect rebound magnitude.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCortexen_US
dc.subjectVisual Cortexen_US
dc.subjectOptogeneticsen_US
dc.subjectPost-Inhibitory Rebounden_US
dc.subjectCircuitryen_US
dc.subjectMouseen_US
dc.titleCharacterizing Mouse V1 Optogenetic-Mediated Rebound Effectsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.date.defence2023-08-11
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscienceen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinern/aen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorShelley Adamoen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerShelley Adamoen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerWilliam Baldridgeen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorNathan Crowderen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalReceiveden_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record