Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorGrant, Jill
dc.contributor.authorHabib, Muhammad Ahsanul
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-16T12:34:42Z
dc.date.available2020-03-16T12:34:42Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationStephen McCarthy, Jill L. Grant & Muhammad Ahsanul Habib (2019) Evaluating strategies for plan coordination: a survey of Canadian planners, International Planning Studies, DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2019.1578201en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/78026
dc.descriptionpre-print version of the paperen_US
dc.description.abstractIn the contemporary context, many Canadian cities have large numbers of plans that present major challenges for coordination and implementation. The paper reports the results of a survey of Canadian planning practitioners who were asked about the strategies they use to coordinate plans and policies. The most highly-rated strategy, collaborating and sharing data for consensus-based decision-making, reflects the dominance of the collaborative planning paradigm in motivating the discipline. Data analysis discovered strong correlations between perceptions of the efficacy of a strategy and practitioners saying they used the strategy: in other words, planners value not only what they have been taught in theory, but what they do in practice.en_US
dc.publisherRoutledge, Taylor and Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Planning Studiesen_US
dc.titleEvaluating Strategies for Plan Coordination: A Survey of Canadian Plannersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record