Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKampen, Keith
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-03T12:40:16Z
dc.date.available2019-09-03T12:40:16Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-03T12:40:16Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/76378
dc.description.abstractOn the Received Interpretation of Augustine’s CA, Augustine's primary aim is to refute the basic principles of Cicero's dogmatic Academic scepticism. In the Letter 1, however, Augustine says he tried to imitate rather than overcome Cicero's Academic position in the CA. In order to reconcile the CA to the Letter 1, I argue in this thesis that Augustine interpreted Cicero as a fallibilist rather than as a dogmatic sceptic. What I think Augustine then does in the CA is imitate Cicero’s fallibilism from the Acad. in the very act of dismantling his interlocutors’ dogmatic interpretations of Cicero’s philosophy. To the extent that this argument holds, I believe it should be safe to conclude that Augustine refutes dogmatic scepticism, but specifically his interlocutors' scepticism and in a way that imitates rather than overcomes Cicero’s project in the Acad..en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAncient Scepticismen_US
dc.subjectThe New Academyen_US
dc.subjectAugustineen_US
dc.subjectCiceroen_US
dc.titleThe Wisdom of Fallibilism in Augustine's Contra Academicos and Cicero's Academica Compareden_US
dc.date.defence2019-08-26
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Classicsen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinern/aen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorEmily Vartoen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerPeter O'Brienen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerEli Diamonden_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorMichael Fournieren_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record