Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCameron, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-31T13:26:38Z
dc.date.available2018-08-31T13:26:38Z
dc.date.issued2018-08-31T13:26:38Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/74185
dc.description.abstractThis paper seeks to grapple with an apparent contradiction in H.G. Wells’s early thought and writings. While his early essays espouse a model of evolutionary theory that anticipates the non-telic models of the twentieth century, his first full-length novel, The Time Machine, seems to claim that humanity is doomed to a future of negative telos, an unstoppable downward path toward degeneration and extinction. By reading The Time Machine alongside a collection of Wells’s early writings, I argue that, while the narrative arc of the novel does map onto what Kelly Hurley calls an “entropic narrative,” the figure of the Morlock acts as a point of rupture that pushes back against the narrator’s story. Thus, the novel is both a depiction of the anthropocentrically biased science of the late nineteenth century and a critique of the concepts that underpin this science.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectWells, H. G. (Herbert George), 1866-1946en_US
dc.subjectThe Time Machineen_US
dc.subjectLate Victorian Scienceen_US
dc.titleMorlocks and Mudfish: Anthropocentrism and Evolution in the Early H.G. Wellsen_US
dc.date.defence2018-08-31
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Englishen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinern/aen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorJason Haslamen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerJason Haslamen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerAnthony Ennsen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerJerry Whiteen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorJason Haslamen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record