dc.contributor.author | Pearce, Barb | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-31T18:13:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-31T18:13:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-08-31T18:13:12Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10222/72171 | |
dc.description.abstract | One of the most shocking post-apartheid developments for South Africa’s farming community has
been the drastic increase in violent crime directed against white farmers – a phenomenon commonly
known as farm attacks. The possible motives driving this violence have been hotly debated; some
white farmers believe farm attacks are an attempt to force the return of land to the black majority,
while others argue they are simply robberies. This study pursues an historical approach to
understanding this violence. Using more than two hundred oral interviews collected in the Midlands
region of KwaZulu-Natal Province, this study concludes that although farm attacks cannot be
separated from the wave of violent crime that has swept South Africa since the early 1990s, the
historical importance of African dispossession and oppression living and working on white-owned
farms plays a larger role in the violence than has previously been understood. Forty-five percent of
rural black respondents identified ill-treatment by white farmers as a primary motive in farm attacks,
while fifty-three percent pointed to acquisitive criminality as the direct cause. Although only two
percent of rural black informants believed the unequal distribution of land is the primary motive in
these attacks, many argued that land plays an important indirect role in the violence. Black people in
rural areas have been, and continue to be, dependent on white farmers for employment due to the
historical process of African dispossession; moreover, informants argued that rural poverty and
crime can largely be explained by a lack of access to land to support independent livelihoods. Ill
treatment by white farmers and acquisitive criminality, then, are linked to landlessness. This not
only underscores the importance of finding a better way forward for the country’s struggling land
reform program, but it also highlights the importance of understanding local histories in explaining
this violence. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | South Africa | en_US |
dc.subject | Farm Attacks | en_US |
dc.subject | Land Reform - South Africa | en_US |
dc.subject | Labour History | en_US |
dc.subject | Post-Apartheid Agrarian Reform | en_US |
dc.subject | Crime | en_US |
dc.subject | Labor - History - South Africa - 20th century. | |
dc.subject | Rural crimes - South Africa | |
dc.title | Cultivating Contention: An Historical Inquiry into Agrarian Reform, Rural Oppression and Farm Attacks in the Midlands of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa | en_US |
dc.date.defence | 2016-08-05 | |
dc.contributor.department | Department of History | en_US |
dc.contributor.degree | Doctor of Philosophy | en_US |
dc.contributor.external-examiner | Dr. Jonny Steinberg | en_US |
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinator | Dr. Justin Roberts | en_US |
dc.contributor.thesis-reader | Dr. Philip Zachernuk | en_US |
dc.contributor.thesis-reader | Dr. Theresa Ulicki | en_US |
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisor | Dr. Gary Kynoch | en_US |
dc.contributor.ethics-approval | Received | en_US |
dc.contributor.manuscripts | Not Applicable | en_US |
dc.contributor.copyright-release | Not Applicable | en_US |