Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Alexander
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-31T17:41:41Z
dc.date.available2016-08-31T17:41:41Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-31T17:41:41Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/72166
dc.description.abstractThis thesis aims to settle an old dispute concerning Aristotle’s concept of analogy and its function in the Metaphysics. The question is whether Aristotle’s theory of pros hen legomena, things predicated in reference to a single term, is implicitly a theory of analogy. In the Middle Ages, such unity of things said in reference to a single source, as the healthy is said in reference to health, was termed the analogy of attribution. Yet Aristotle never explicitly refers to pros hen unity as analogical unity. To arrive at an answer to this question, this thesis explores Aristotle’s concept of analogy with an eye to its actual function in the argument of the Metaphysics. As such, it offers an account of the place and role of analogy in Aristotelian first philosophy.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectMetaphysics
dc.subjectAristotle
dc.subjectAnalogy
dc.titleAristotle's Concept of Analogy and its Function in the Metaphysicsen_US
dc.date.defence2016-08-17
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Classicsen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinern/aen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorDr. Eli Diamonden_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Wayne Hankeyen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Kyle Fraseren_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDr. Eli Diamonden_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record