Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPotter, Eric
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-30T16:41:36Z
dc.date.available2016-08-30T16:41:36Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-30T16:41:36Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/72137
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis, I explore the possibility of an egalitarian theory that reconciles distributive and relational approaches. Although I will not advance a complete and unified theory of equality, I will discuss the advantages of both approaches in some detail in order to offer what I call a relational-capabilities egalitarian approach, which provides a plausible reconciliation of both approaches into a broader and more complete theory of justice. In the first chapter of this work, I will explain the general egalitarian project and discuss in detail a few of the more influential recent distributive egalitarian approaches. I argue in favour of a capabilities metric of justice, as advanced by Sen, Nussbaum, Wolff, and de-Shalit. In Chapter Two, I will discuss some of the important feminist criticisms and advancements made to distributive egalitarian theories. I will argue that Elizabeth Anderson’s sufficientarian conception of democratic equality is best for combining feminist concerns about group-based oppression, with the distributive arrangements necessary for guaranteeing equal democratic standing for all. In the third chapter I will introduce the relational methodology, and contrast it with the distributive approaches that I discuss in the first and second chapters, in order to show that relational egalitarians raise serious and considerable challenges to the distributive approach. In Chapter Four, I will advance my own view of relational-capabilities egalitarianism, as a program for reconciling distributive and relational theories of equality. Finally, in Chapter Five, I will consider some objections to my view, and briefly discuss some of the more fundamental disagreements between relational and distributive egalitarians. Ultimately, I intend to offer a programmatic illustration of how relational and distributive egalitarian approaches may be united in a much broader, fully formed egalitarian theory.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectJusticeen_US
dc.subjectEgalitarianismen_US
dc.subjectFeminismen_US
dc.subjectRelationalen_US
dc.subjectDistributiveen_US
dc.subjectRawls, John, 1921-2002en_US
dc.subjectNussbaum, Martha Craven, 1947-en_US
dc.subjectAnderson, Elizabeth, 1959-en_US
dc.subjectEquality
dc.subjectSen, Amartya
dc.titleJust Trying to Relate: Exploring a Potential Middle Ground Between Relational and Distributive Egalitarian Theoriesen_US
dc.date.defence2016-08-26
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinern/aen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorMichael Hymersen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerKirstin Borgersonen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDuncan MacIntoshen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorGreg Scherkoskeen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseYesen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record