Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFong, Travis
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-23T17:50:57Z
dc.date.available2016-04-23T17:50:57Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-19
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/71492
dc.description.abstractThis study compares the size of the road networks in amalgamated and non-amalgamated cities. According to Bettencourt et al., cities road networks follow a power scaling relation. Rui Yikangs model for urban development suggests that polycentric cities road networks are expected to be less efficient than monocentric cities. By arguing that amalgamated cities develop as polycentric cities, while non-amalgamated cities do not, this study attempts to test, if there is any statistically significant difference between amalgamated and non-amalgamated cities road network scaling relations. The findings of this study show that amalgamated cities road networks are larger than their non-amalgamated counterparts, suggesting links between maintenance cost, and energy use for transportation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectRoad Networksen_US
dc.subjectMunicipal Amalgamationen_US
dc.subjectUrban Growthen_US
dc.subjectUrban Developmenten_US
dc.subjectMunicipal Transportationen_US
dc.titleComparing Road Network Scaling Relations of Amalgamated and Non-Amalgamated Canadian Citiesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record