Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAllam, Hesham
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-25T17:52:52Z
dc.date.available2013-03-25T17:52:52Z
dc.date.issued2013-03-25
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/21423
dc.descriptionThe thesis investigates employees' motivation to participate in enterprise social tagging tools. It describes and validates a conceputal model composed of three types of motivations: technical, social, and organizational.en_US
dc.description.abstractOrganizations are attempting to leverage their knowledge resources by integrating knowledge sharing systems, a key and new form of which are social computing tools. A large number of these initiatives fail, however, due to employees' reluctance to use, contribute content to, and share knowledge through such tools. Although research regarding one's motivation to share knowledge is extensive, there has been little research examining social computing systems, especially from the seeking and contributory perspectives—the two distinct, but closely interrelated facets of knowledge sharing. Motivated by such concerns, and by incorporating knowledge-seeking and knowledge- contribution perspectives in a single study, this research develops and empirically examines a theoretical model to explain what motivates employees to seek, contribute and share social tags using Enterprise Social Tagging Tools (ESTTs). Two research phases were employed to address the research objective. The goal of the first phase of the study was to explore factors affecting users’ tagging behavior in online social tagging tools. An extensive literature review was synthesized and a preliminary theoretical model emerged. A pilot study was conducted yielding 184 responses featuring eight different online social tagging tools. Mostly, the preliminary theoretical model showed positive influence on users’ tag behavior with a special focus on the newly developed concepts of information retrievability, information refindability. The goal of the study’s second phase was combining the results from the first phase with motivational theories to build and validate a belief-based and socio-organizational model that can explain employees’ tag seeking, contributing, and sharing behavior in ESTTs. The model was developed by employing theories such as Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and social exchange theory. Through a large-scale survey (n=481) in two large Information Technology (IT) companies, the model was validated. The results speak to the importance of the three newly developed factors impacting employees’ tag seeking, contributing and sharing behavior. These factors are uniquely context-specific reflecting actual features of social tagging tools and potentially social media in general. Particularly, the results reveal that employees' tag seeking behavior is affected by their perception of the ESTTs in terms of enjoyment, information retrievability, ease of use, and managerial influence. In the context of tag contribution and sharing, the results show that employees contribute and share tags because of their perception of information refindability, ease of use, altruism, and pro-sharing norms. Differences among the seeking, contributing and sharing model have implications for future research and practice.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectSocial tagging, social bookmarking, social media, enterprise motivation, social computing, TAM, intrensic motivation,en_US
dc.titleSOCIAL, TECHNICAL, AND ORGANIZATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF EMPLOYEES’ PARTICIPATION IN ENTERPRISE SOCIAL TAGGING TOOLS: A CONCEPTUAL MODEL AND AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATIONen_US
dc.date.defence2013-02-08
dc.contributor.departmentInterdisciplinary PhD Programmeen_US
dc.contributor.degreeInterdisciplinary PhDen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerDr. Kelly Lyonsen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorDr. William Bakeren_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Louise Spiterien_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Hossam Ali Hassanen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDr. Michael Bliemel;Dr. James Blusteinen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalReceiveden_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record