Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPayton, Jonathan
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-06T14:05:09Z
dc.date.available2011-09-06T14:05:09Z
dc.date.issued2011-09-06
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/14197
dc.description.abstractThis work is dedicated to the development of a unified account of both theoretical and practical rationality. I adopt a particular view of evaluative properties, according to which entities are evaluated as good or bad according to how well they fulfill the constitutive functions of their kinds. I argue that the function of belief is to accurately represent reality, while the function of action is to satisfy the agent’s desires. These functions fix the goodness- or success-conditions of belief and action. With these functions in place, I adopt a reliabilist conception of reasoning which evaluates reasoning processes by how well they allow us to achieve the constitutive aims of belief and action. Moreover, I argue that the process of determining which action will best satisfy our desires is a cognitive matter – non-cognitive states like desire do not actually provide the agent with reasons.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectActionen_US
dc.subjectBeliefen_US
dc.subjectReasonen_US
dc.subjectRationalityen_US
dc.subjectDesireen_US
dc.subjectTruthen_US
dc.titleTheoretical and Practical Rationality: Towards a Unified Accounten_US
dc.date.defence2011-08-15
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerProf. Kirstin Borgersonen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorProf. Mike Hymersen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerProf. Duncan MacIntoshen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorProf. Greg Scherkoskeen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record