| dc.contributor.author | Workentin, Mike | |
| dc.contributor.author | Castro Arteaga, Mariangela | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alamgir, AKM | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kupka, Courtney F. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-26T17:50:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-05-26T17:50:12Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Workentin, M., Castro Arteaga, M., Alamgir, AKM., & Kupka, C.F. (2022). PRISMA statement and Cochrane reviews: Striving to improve quality and validity of systematic reviews. [Blog]. Access Alliance: Toronto. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13610.29121 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10222/81679 | |
| dc.description | The Research and Evaluation Team of Access Alliance completed a review and comparison of the PRISMA Statement and Cochrane Review as part of an ongoing KMb initiative in their current CYRRC-funded project: “Implementation Research on the Impact of Social Isolation on Refugee Children and Youth: their Resilience and Coping Mechanisms”. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Using a standard method for conducting a systematic literature review is always a choice among a few global practice recommendations. In order to support our literature review process as evidence-informed, we conducted a comparative review of the two most popular schools of thought - PRISMA Statement and the Cochrane Handbook. We concluded with the statement that these two methods are not mutually exclusive, but rather supplementary to each other. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Access Alliance | en_US |
| dc.title | PRISMA statement and Cochrane reviews: Striving to improve quality and validity of systematic reviews | en_US |
| dc.type | Report | en_US |
