Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRutherford, Derek
dc.contributor.authorHurley, Sean
dc.contributor.authorHubley-Kozey, Cheryl
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-31T17:39:45Z
dc.date.available2016-05-31T17:39:45Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationPublished version: Rutherford, D. J., Hurley, S. T., & Hubley-Kozey, C. (2016). Sit-to-stand transfer mechanics in healthy older adults: a comprehensive investigation of a portable lifting-seat device. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 11(2), 158-165.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/71745
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2014.921843
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate lower extremity mechanics and muscle activation associated with the sit-to-stand transfer using a portable lifting-seat device and to compare these data to an unassisted transfer in healthy young and older adults. Methods: Bilateral lower extremity and low back musculature electromyography, three-dimensional leg and trunk motion, and ground reaction forces were recorded from 10 young (mean age = 25) and 10 older (mean age = 69) adults during five trials of (i) no assist and (ii) assisted transfers. Data were time normalized to represent the period of seat-off to standing. Peak sagittal plane joint angles, moments, and muscle activity profiles were calculated. Analysis of variance models was used to test for main effects and interactions (α = 0.05). Results: Trunk, hip, and knee angles were significantly reduced and dorsiflexion increased with assisted transfer (p < 0.05). Peak hip and ankle joint moments were reduced (p < 0.05) and no change found in knee moments (p > 0.05). Peak muscle activity was lower during the assisted transfer (p < 0.05). Seat device effects were similar between age groups. Older adults used higher relative muscle activation. Conclusion: Variables indicative of sit-to-stand functional demand were reduced with lifting-seat device use. Data provide a framework for future recommendations on product prescription, use, and research pertaining to the advancement of adaptive seating. Implications for Rehabilitation Hip and trunk mechanical demands, and muscle activation were reduced with portable lifting seat device use. Greater ankle dorsiflexion was found with portable lifting seat device use, suggesting this range of motion should be considered when prescribing this device. Healthy older and younger adults used similar knee and trunk joint mechanics yet older adults completed the sit-to-stand trials with greater lower extremity and low back muscle activation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank the individuals of the Dynamics of Human Movement Laboratory, Dalhousie University for their support in data acquisition. They would also like to thank Uplift Technologies for providing the seat devices for the study. This work was supported by a National Sciences and Engineering Research Counsel of Canada (NSERC) Engage Grant (#EGP/418922-2011).en_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDisability Rehabilitation: Assistive Technologyen_US
dc.subjectElectromyographyen_US
dc.subjectlift-seat device
dc.subjectlower extremity
dc.subjectmechanics
dc.subjectolder adults
dc.subjectsit-to-stand
dc.subjectrehabilitation
dc.titleSit-to-stand transfer mechanics in healthy older adults: A comprehensive investigation of a portable lifting seat device.en_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record