Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClairmont, Don
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-18T15:29:28Z
dc.date.available2015-11-18T15:29:28Z
dc.date.issued2010-12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/64630
dc.description.abstractThe evaluation assessment has been fully summarized in seventeen points on pages 57 to 59 of this report. Essentially the John Howard Society and its restorative justice agency initially had a broad set of objectives for the project wherein the YCLW would play both a liaison role to the CJS for youth and an outreach role vis-à-vis the accused youths and their families. Government specification centered strongly on the liaison role -getting the youth engaged more quickly in the court process via legal aid, to their own and to the justice system’s benefit. The governmental emphasis reflected clearly that the project was largely a response to the recommendations of the Nunn Inquiry concerning processing youth cases.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAtlantic Institute of Criminologyen_US
dc.titleCrime Prevention and Youth Case Processing: Where and How to Invest and Interveneen_US
dc.title.alternativeThe John Howard R.J. Society's Youth Court Liaison Project: Final Evaluation Reporten_US
dc.typeReporten_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record