Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUngar, Michaelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-25T18:18:28Z
dc.date.available2014-03-25T18:18:28Z
dc.date.issued2003-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationUngar, Michael. 2003. "A Reply to Geoffrey Greif." Social Service Review 77(2): 309-311.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0037-7961en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/46244
dc.description.abstractReplies to Geoffrey L. Greif's (2003) critique of the author's (2002) deeper ecological approach toward conducting social work. Greif's perception of Carol Meyer's & Edgar Auerswald's work as important for associating ecological models with systems theory is supported; however, it is argued that Greif fails to comprehend the author's attempt to develop a social ecological model of social work practice that is not based upon systems theory. It is asserted that systems-based ecological paradigms for performing social work ultimately create dichotomies between clients & social workers. Three principles that should guide the creation of future ecological models for social work practice are stated, eg, the significance of cooperation & mutuality. Indeed, it is claimed that several social work theorists have called for an ecological social work perspective that acknowledges the connection between the well-being of one's physical surroundings & one's psychological & social health. 4 References. J. W. Parkeren_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSocial Service Reviewen_US
dc.titleA Reply to Geoffrey Greifen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume77en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage309en_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record