Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGosse, Meghan
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-05T13:17:11Z
dc.date.available2015-08-05T13:17:11Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/58985
dc.description.abstractA relatively new, elective and increasing medical procedure in the West known as “female genital cosmetic surgery” (FGCS) claims to have the ability to enhance the functional and aesthetic features of women’s genitalia. Using FGCS online discussion forums, this study examines the experiences of women who have undergone, or are contemplating undergoing, genital cosmetic surgery, and explores surgeons’ websites in order to understand how FGCS is marketed and promoted online. Using content analysis, this study found that women and clinic websites reported aesthetic concerns, psychological issues, physical discomfort and sexual reasons as the primary motivations for having surgery. Furthermore, this study found that surgeons’ websites advertise FGCS as a “low-risk” procedure, which acts as a reasonable solution for correcting an “abnormal” body part (i.e., the female genitals), and which women are increasingly becoming aware of in large part due to emerging normative standards of the vulva.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectThe bodyen_US
dc.subjectHealthen_US
dc.subjectGenderen_US
dc.titleIn Pursuit Of The "Designer Vagina"en_US
dc.date.defence2015-07-21
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Sociology & Social Anthropologyen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerDr. Liesl Gambolden_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorDr. Liz Fittingen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Fiona Martinen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDr. Emma Whelanen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record