Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOsberg, L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, ZXen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-07T12:43:28Z
dc.date.available2013-08-07T12:43:28Z
dc.date.issued2000-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationOsberg, L., and ZX Lin. 2000. "How much of Canada's unemployment is structural?." Canadian Public Policy-Analyse De Politiques 26: 141-S157.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0317-0861en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3552509en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/34106
dc.description.abstractThis paper starts from the definition that "structural unemployment occurs when workers are unable to fill available jobs because they lack the skills, do not live where jobs are available, or are unwilling to work at the wage rate offered in the market." This implies that the number of vacancies in the Canadian labour market is an upper bound to the extent of "structural unemployment." The paper summarizes available estimates of the vacancy rate in Canada. In the high technology sector, vacancies may be equivalent to 2.2 percent of the labour force but evidence from more representative surveys indicates a range of 0.45 to 0.75 percent for the economy as a whole. Although during the 1980s the outward shift in the relationship between the Help-Wanted Index and the unemployment rate raised concerns that structural unemployment was an increasing problem in Canada, that shift has been reversed in the 1990s.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofCanadian Public Policy-Analyse De Politiquesen_US
dc.titleHow much of Canada's unemployment is structural?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.startpage141en_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record