Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAmegadzie, Mark Yao
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-16T13:44:39Z
dc.date.available2019-12-16T13:44:39Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-16T13:44:39Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/76810
dc.description.abstractThe research in this study was completed to investigate the effects of thermal-mechanical working on spark plasma sintered (SPS) powder metallurgy (PM) preforms. Two alloys (PA2219 and an Al-Sc-Zr ternary) were considered as were two means of working – asymmetric rolling (ASR) and upset forging. To gain a firm understanding of the fundamental elements of ASR and ultimately deduce the best rolling parameters for the SPS PM alloys, research in this area commenced with studies on the well-known wrought aluminum alloy 6061. Results indicated that the utilization of a higher velocity ratio as well as a small initial thickness of the sample imparted gains in mechanical properties to the finished product. Meanwhile, changes to roller velocities and rolling direction were found to be insignificant. EBSD analysis revealed that the microstructure became more homogenized with a reduction in the number of passes. The findings from preliminary studies on AA6061 were then used to process the SPS PM alloys. The rolling schedules resulted in full densification of the sintered Al-Sc-Zr billets while Al3(Sc,Zr) precipitates observed via transmission electron microscopy (TEM) in the sintered preforms were seemingly unaffected by the rolling process. Generally, decreases in the rolling temperature yielded marginal gains in mechanical properties. The Al-Sc-Zr alloy sintered at 500⁰C and rolled at 200⁰C exhibited the highest concentration of low angle grain boundaries (LAGBs) and the most desirable combination of hardness and tensile properties. In forging trials, all strains and strain rates were found to impart full densification of the Al-Sc-Zr preforms. Interestingly, the lowest forging strain considered (0.4 mm/mm) imparted sizable improvements in tensile properties. In particular, tensile ductility was ~40x greater than that measured in the as-sintered counterpart. However, excessive plastic strain (1.6) fostered dynamic recrystallization and possibly the formation of adiabatic shear bands that invoked declines in tensile properties. Strain rate was also found to be influential as lower rates enhanced recrystallization prompting reductions in yield strength and minor gains in ductility. For the PA2219 PM alloy, forging achieved full densification of sintered preforms. In addition, the forging process imparted gains in the tensile properties. Further improvements in tensile strength were realized in the heat treated (T87) specimens. For instance, the yield strength of the forged-T87 products were some 40-60% higher than counterpart specimens tested in the as-forged (T1) state. The optimum tensile properties were obtained for the specimen SPS processed 550⁰C and Forged (T87) at 500⁰C (YS=354MPa, UTS = 466MPa, Elongation =13%). One of the critical observations made was that a continuous oxide film was present in the microstructure of the spark plasma sintered billet. Fortunately, this tenacious layer was disrupted through upset forging. The discretization of this oxide network would have contributed towards the improved tensile properties in the forged products especially the ductility.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectManufacturingen_US
dc.subjectPowder Metallurgyen_US
dc.subjectAluminumen_US
dc.subjectForgingen_US
dc.subjectAsymmetric Rollingen_US
dc.subjectEBSDen_US
dc.subjectTextureen_US
dc.subjectSpark Plasma Sinteringen_US
dc.subjectMicroscopyen_US
dc.subjectMechanical Propertiesen_US
dc.subjectTensileen_US
dc.subjectHardnessen_US
dc.subjectPA2219en_US
dc.subjectAA6061en_US
dc.subjectAl-Sc-Zren_US
dc.subjectOxideen_US
dc.subjectAl2O3en_US
dc.subjectHot workingen_US
dc.subjectTEMen_US
dc.subjectGrain Boundary Misorientationen_US
dc.titleTHERMOMECHANICAL PROCESSING OF SPARK PLASMA SINTERED ALUMINUM POWDER METALLURGY ALLOYS VIA ASYMMETRIC ROLLING AND UPSET FORGINGen_US
dc.date.defence2019-12-03
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerDr. Lukas Bichleren_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorDr. Dominic Groulxen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Stephen Corbinen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerMr. Ian Donaldsonen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDr. Paul Bishopen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record