Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStine, Henry
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-01T18:56:19Z
dc.date.available2024-05-01T18:56:19Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-30
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/84179
dc.description.abstractThis thesis analyzes a United Nations (UN) sponsored policy report prepared by two research institutions titled Unlocking a Better Future, which sought to guide leaders on sustainable development and centers the idea that system-wide change requires new social norms. Drawing on Sewell’s 1999 treatise on culture, and the research programme of World-Society Theory (WST), I ask what factors constrain the UN as a sociocultural institution, one that develops and propagates norms, principles, and shared social understandings, and how are they expressed in Unlocking a Better Future? I find that the UN’s norm-building is constrained by its ability to be coherent across complex political arrangements and policy domains; by lacking real authority in a ‘polycentric’ governance system; by contradictory/conflictual elements inherent to norms that create change faster than they can be resolved; and by using rationalized logics that are cumulative and do not account well for alternative social understandings and worldviews.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectsociology of cultureen_US
dc.subjectsustainable developmenten_US
dc.subjectUnited Nationsen_US
dc.titleWorld Culture & the United Nationsen_US
dc.date.defence2024-04-30
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Sociology & Social Anthropologyen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinern/aen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerElizabeth Fittingen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerChris Hellanden_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorKaren Fosteren_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record