Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKrow, Matilka
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-05T18:52:49Z
dc.date.available2024-04-05T18:52:49Z
dc.date.issued2005-10
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/83702
dc.description.abstractThis text will argue that Aristotelian phantasia does not form a full capacity in the psyche and, instead, by drawing on its causal origins in perception, acts as an activity serving in the role of helpmate to capacities and other activities. Despite its seemingly simple role in providing representations in the psyche, phantasia proves a rich concept which Aristotle uses to explore many phenomena, such as dreaming, movement and action, and memory. Its position between perception and thought and its role in allowing universals to begin gaining entry into the psyche not only allows it to participate in various psychic activities but also proves of importance in Aristotle's philosophy in a larger sense. Indeed, this text will suggest that phantasia plays an important role in linking the perceivable and the thinkable in the Aristotelian psyche.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAristotle -- Criticism and interpretationen_US
dc.subjectPhantasia (The Greek word)en_US
dc.titleAristotle on Phantasiaen_US
dc.date.defence2005-10
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Classicsen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerunknownen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerWayne Hankeyen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerPeter o'Brienen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDennis Houseen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record