Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStapleton, Katia
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-22T12:32:48Z
dc.date.available2022-08-22T12:32:48Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-22
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/81866
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines David Lurie’s transgressive thoughts and behaviours in J.M. Coetzee’s Disgrace (1999) and draws conclusions about their function. Using Michel Foucault’s definition of transgression – which classifies it as a productive means to question tacit laws – the central argument maintains that David’s predatory behaviours, paradoxical rationalizations, and unboundaried ideas about fatherhood are necessary efforts to question various social roles in the context of the post-apartheid period. I also contend that David’s conflation of sexual desire and fatherly care in Disgrace points to one of Coetzee’s larger projects: to dismantle glossy ideas about nuclear family structures and to expose the white patriarchal Afrikaner ideals that persist in South Africa even after the end of apartheid.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectpost-apartheiden_US
dc.subjectJ.M. Coetzeeen_US
dc.subjectpatriarchyen_US
dc.subjecttransgressionen_US
dc.titleTransgressive Fathering in J.M. Coetzee's Disgraceen_US
dc.date.defence2022-08-09
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Englishen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinern/aen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorDr. Bart Vautouren_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Asha Jeffersen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Heather Jessupen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDr. Alice Brittanen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record