Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVincent, Nicolle
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-15T15:18:39Z
dc.date.available2017-09-15T15:18:39Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-15T15:18:39Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/73316
dc.description.abstractThere is a well-established disconnect between research evidence and health practice. This has prompted efforts to improve knowledge translation (KT) between knowledge producers and knowledge users. Little is known about what motivates health researchers to engage in KT activities. Focusing attention on graduate student researchers can inform early interventions in order to shape future KT practices. The overall objective of this dissertation was to investigate the correlates that help explain graduate students’ intentions to participate in KT; specifically, research dissemination to audiences outside of the academic community. This form of KT activity was labelled as non-traditional research dissemination (NTD), to contrast it with the more familiar form of traditional research dissemination (TD) to academic audiences (e.g., peer-reviewed publications). This dissertation involved a mixed-methods approach with four phases that generated three papers addressing the study objectives. Using the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) as the framework, results from a focus group (n = 30) and pilot work led to the development of an online survey. Data from the online survey (n = 419) assessed the utility of the TPB global constructs (Paper 1) and specific beliefs (Paper 2) in predicting NTD and TD intentions among graduate students in health disciplines. A sub-sample (n = 16) participated in interviews further exploring perceptions of NTD (Paper 3). The integrated results provide evidence that the proposed augmented TPB model is a reasonable framework for understanding the influences of both TD and NTD intention. The findings point to four principal observations. First, most graduate students have a favorable attitude towards the benefits of NTD as a means to contribute and make a difference with their work. Second, low self-efficacy, minimal support from the research supervisor, and believing that other graduate students do not do this work, all serve as barriers to intention formations. Third, moral responsibility influences NTD intentions but not TD intentions. Finally, past experience and future career dissemination plans strongly influence intentions to participate during graduate school. Overall, this work highlights how these modifiable variables could be useful for guiding interventions and resources to promote KT participation.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectGraduate Studentsen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge Translationen_US
dc.subjectTheory of Planned Behaviouren_US
dc.titleThe Intentions of Graduate Student Researchers to Participate in Knowledge Translation: A Mixed Methods Investigationen_US
dc.date.defence2016-07-14
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscienceen_US
dc.contributor.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerDr. Melanie Barwicken_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorDr. Simon Sherryen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Sophie Jacquesen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Shannon Johnsonen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Chris Blancharden_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDr. Lynne Robinsonen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalReceiveden_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record