Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMacPhail, Fiona.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-21T12:37:44Z
dc.date.available1996
dc.date.issued1996en_US
dc.identifier.otherAAINN15884en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/55126
dc.descriptionThis thesis, comprised of three essays, focuses upon changes in individual employment earnings inequality in Canada during the 1980s. The empirical analysis uses data from the Survey of Work History (1981), the comparable Labour Market Activity Survey (1986 and 1989), and the Survey of Consumer Finances (1986 and 1989).en_US
dc.descriptionThe first essay addresses the question: "Do researchers' measurement choices influence our understanding of earnings inequality?" Changes in earnings inequality are assessed in terms of statistical significance and the magnitudes are compared to those observed in other countries and in the previous decade. A central issue examined is whether, for a given definition of the population (for example, all male workers or full-time/full-year female workers), the trends in earnings inequality are robust to measurement choices. Apart from practical implications, the results are used to make several observations about economic methodology.en_US
dc.descriptionThe second essay empirically examines the relationship between macroeconomic conditions and earnings inequality, within a specific model of labour market adjustment which is a novel feature of this essay. The model shows the conditions under which changes in firms labour strategies influence the degree of earnings inequality. Regression analysis is used to test the hypothesis that the inverse relationship between macroeconomic conditions and earnings inequality weakened in the late 1980s, as has been reported for the U.S.; and we conclude that the hypothesis can be rejected.en_US
dc.descriptionIn the third essay, the labour market model of essay two is extended to incorporate other dimensions of inequality which are the age and education premia and other determinants, namely. structural, institutional, and demographic factors. Macroeconomic and unionization variables are found to be consistent and significant determinants of the three inequality dimensions. Support also exists for other hypothesized relationships, such as the relationship between the relative supply of university-educated workers and education premium, and the relationship between technological change and earnings inequality.en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph.D.)--Dalhousie University (Canada), 1996.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherDalhousie Universityen_US
dc.publisheren_US
dc.subjectEconomics, Labor.en_US
dc.titleThree essays on earnings inequality in Canada during the 1980s.en_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.contributor.degreePh.D.en_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record