Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRitchie, Marina L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRomanuk, Tamara Natashaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-04T18:44:09Z
dc.date.available2013-07-04T18:44:09Z
dc.date.issued2012-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationRitchie, Marina L., and Tamara N. Romanuk. 2012. "A Meta-Analysis of Probiotic Efficacy for Gastrointestinal Diseases." Plos One 7(4): 34938-e34938.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034938en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/29476
dc.description.abstractBackground: Meta-analyses on the effects of probiotics on specific gastrointestinal diseases have generally shown positive effects on disease prevention and treatment; however, the relative efficacy of probiotic use for treatment and prevention across different gastrointestinal diseases, with differing etiology and mechanisms of action, has not been addressed. Methods/Principal Findings: We included randomized controlled trials in humans that used a specified probiotic in the treatment or prevention of Pouchitis, Infectious diarrhea, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Helicobacter pylori, Clostridium difficile Disease, Antibiotic Associated Diarrhea, Traveler's Diarrhea, or Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Random effects models were used to evaluate efficacy as pooled relative risks across the eight diseases as well as across probiotic species, single vs. multiple species, patient ages, dosages, and length of treatment. Probiotics had a positive significant effect across all eight gastrointestinal diseases with a relative risk of 0.58 (95% (CI) 0.51-0.65). Six of the eight diseases: Pouchitis, Infectious diarrhea, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Helicobacter pylori, Clostridium difficile Disease, and Antibiotic Associated Diarrhea, showed positive significant effects. Traveler's Diarrhea and Necrotizing Enterocolitis did not show significant effects of probiotcs. Of the 11 species and species mixtures, all showed positive significant effects except for Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus plantarum, and Bifidobacterium infantis. Across all diseases and probiotic species, positive significant effects of probiotics were observed for all age groups, single vs. multiple species, and treatment lengths. Conclusions/Significance: Probiotics are generally beneficial in treatment and prevention of gastrointestinal diseases. Efficacy was not observed for Traveler's Diarrhea or Necrotizing Enterocolitis or for the probiotic species L. acidophilus, L. plantarum, and B. infantis. When choosing to use probiotics in the treatment or prevention of gastrointestinal disease, the type of disease and probiotic species (strain) are the most important factors to take into consideration.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofPlos Oneen_US
dc.titleA Meta-Analysis of Probiotic Efficacy for Gastrointestinal Diseasesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage34938en_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record