Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPhang, Kevin
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-28T12:36:42Z
dc.date.available2012-08-28T12:36:42Z
dc.date.issued2012-08-28
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/15392
dc.description.abstractThis thesis explores the topic of decision under conditions of complete uncertainty, advocating an interdisciplinary perspective that benefits from the insights of both economists and philosophers. Thus far, most of the results in the field have been the work of economists who have been responsible for important theorems and axiomatic characterizatoins of a variety of decision rules. While proceeding from a different methodology and focus, tantalizingly similar conjectures have been made by philosophical logicians. While the work of the latter has not (yet) become as advanced in deriving important theorems, I suggest that philosophers have something useful to offer in their method of analysis that would be useful in evaluating the different solutions to standard problems in the field. I attempt to provide a new solution motivated by both disciplines.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectdecision theoryen_US
dc.subjectcomplete uncertaintyen_US
dc.subjectcomplete ignoranceen_US
dc.subjectveil of ignoranceen_US
dc.subjectextensionen_US
dc.titleDecision under Complete Uncertainty: Bridging Economic and Philosophical Researchen_US
dc.date.defence2012-08-22
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerDr. Michael Hymersen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorDr. Michael Hymersen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Duncan MacIntoshen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDr. Peter K. Schotchen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record