Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPelletier, Nathaniel L
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-14T17:14:17Z
dc.date.available2010-05-14T17:14:17Z
dc.date.issued2010-05-14
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/12821
dc.description.abstractAchieving environmental s¬ustainability in human organization is the defining challenge of the modern era. In light of the inability of the existing economic paradigm to provide for sustainability objectives, novel approaches to understanding and managing economic activities are required. Towards this end, the emergent field of ecological economics provides an alternative paradigm that expressly prioritizes the development of the theory and tools necessary to operationalize environmental sustainability in economic activity, which is viewed as prerequisite to sustainability in any other sphere. Here, I advance an internally consistent framework for understanding and implementing the core ecological economic sustainability criteria: appropriate scale relative to biocapacity; distributive justice; and efficient allocation. This framework includes: (1) an ecological communitarian conception of distributive justice which recognizes environmental sustainability as the first principle of distributive justice; (2) the rationale for biophysically-consistent ecological economic modeling of human activities as a basis for environmentally-enlightened policy and management; and (3) an appeal for scale-oriented environmental governance as could potentially be operationalized by a strong, centralized World Environment Organization. I further apply this framework to evaluating the current and future status of livestock production systems at regional and global scales with respect to efficiency considerations as well as their relationships to sustainability boundary conditions for human activities as a whole. It is suggested that the current and projected scale of the livestock sector is fundamentally unsustainable, and that all leverage points must be exploited to rein in this sector in the interest of preventing irreversible ecological change. This must include, but cannot be limited to, strong eco-efficiency measures and changes in production technologies, species substitutions, and consumption patterns and volumes. Outcomes are interpreted in terms of their implications for environmental policy and governance oriented towards the sustainability objective.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectecological economicsen_US
dc.subjectsustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental governanceen_US
dc.subjectenvironmental ethicsen_US
dc.subjectlife cycle assessmenten_US
dc.subjectlivestocken_US
dc.titleWHAT’S AT STEAK? ECOLOGICAL ECONOMIC SUSTAINABILITY AND THE ETHICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS FOR GLOBAL LIVESTOCK PRODUCTIONen_US
dc.date.defence2010-04-26
dc.contributor.departmentInterdisciplinary PhD Programmeen_US
dc.contributor.degreeInterdisciplinary PhDen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerDr. Steven Youngen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorDr. Marina Pluzhenskayaen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Richard Apostleen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. David VanderZwaagen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDr. Peter Tyedmersen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsYesen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseYesen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record