Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcIsaac, Corrine
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-12T10:47:02Z
dc.date.available2018-04-12T10:47:02Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/73867
dc.description.abstractSurgical site infections (SSIs) are the most common of hospital acquired infections, occurring in 2-5% of patients undergoing inpatient surgery. SSIs are expensive for the healthcare system, and cause significant morbidity and mortality among surgical patients. At present, most SSI surveillance is completed in the acute-care setting, and hospital infection control programs do not always include a standardized methodology for post-discharge surveillance (PDS). However, approximately 60% of SSIs occur following discharge and therefore, the true rate of SSI is likely underreported. Moreover, the lack of standardization for post-discharge data collection has resulted in a limited understanding of SSIs in the post-acute and home care areas. This study evaluated the feasibility of a web-based surgical site infection (SSI) tool(how2trak) that used the 1999 United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for the detection of SSIs (Mangram, et al., 1999). Feasibility was evaluated by measuring concordance, a measure of inter-rater reliability, within paired RN assessors and RN assessor feedback regarding the usefulness of the tool. Patient referral and recruitment, RN pair assessments using the how2trak SSI tool, and follow-up visits with the patients occurred from March 2015 through July 2016 at 3 Calea Home Care Clinics in Toronto. Discussion groups were carried out in 2 sessions via teleconference on September 6 and 7, 2016. Overall high concordance within pairs of RN assessors was demonstrated; in many instances, concordance rates were reported above eighty percent. Discussion groups reported that the how2trak tool was a user friendly and useful data collection tool in the clinical setting, and that it made tracking patient outcomes more efficient than the traditional paper-based tool. Using the CDC guidelines for the identification of an SSI, the prevalence of SSIs post-discharge in the Calea Clinic was found to be 34.6 %. Overall, this study demonstrated that the how2trak tool is a feasible data collection tool for RNs in the Calea Clinics. Therefore, the how2trak tool provides a feasible option for standardizing data collection and analysis for the assessment of SSIs post-discharge across clinic settings.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectsurgical site infectionen_US
dc.subjectsurgical site infection surveillanceen_US
dc.subjectpost discharge surgical site infection surveillanceen_US
dc.subjectpost discharge surveillanceen_US
dc.subjectpatient safetyen_US
dc.subjecte-health tools for surgical site infection surveillanceen_US
dc.titleExamination of the Feasibility of the HOW2TRAK® Surgical Site Infection Tool in the Assessment of Surgical Site Infections in a Home Care Settingen_US
dc.date.defence2018-01-12
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Nursingen_US
dc.contributor.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerDr. Monica Perryen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorDr. Marilyn Macdonalden_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Diane Doranen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Gordon Flowerdewen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Marilyn Mac Donalden_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDr. Jean Hughesen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalReceiveden_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNoen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNoen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record