Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaylis, F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-22T17:50:14Z
dc.date.available2013-11-22T17:50:14Z
dc.date.issued2009-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationBaylis, F.. 2009. "The HFEA public consultation process on hybrids and chimeras: informed, effective, and meaningful?." Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal 19(1): 41-62.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1054-6863en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/39691
dc.description.abstractIn September 2007, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) in the United Kingdom concluded that "there is no fundamental reason to prevent cytoplasmic hybrid research ... this area of research can, with caution and careful scrutiny, be permitted." Later, in January 2008, HFEA issued two research licenses to create humanesque cytoplasmic hybrid embryos from which stem cells could be derived. This article critically examines the public consultation process that preceded these decisions, concluding that the process was flawed and demonstrating how the HFEA documents summarizing the findings of the public consultation process misrepresent the public's contributions to this policymaking initiative.en_US
dc.language.isoCheck Language Codeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKennedy Institute of Ethics journalen_US
dc.titleThe HFEA public consultation process on hybrids and chimeras: informed, effective, and meaningful?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.volume19en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage41en_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record