Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLima, Thiago
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-04T15:19:43Z
dc.date.available2013-09-04T15:19:43Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-04
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/36304
dc.description.abstractBasically there is no fixed meaning for the term „Nachahmung“ Imitation. In order to understand the nuances of the meaning of the term "mimesis" and its different interpretations, it is necessary to take into consideration the connotative extension of this concept. In this work the focus will be particularly on the fields of poetry, art and aesthetics in the 18th century on the theories of Winckelmann, Gottsched and Lenz. Such accentuation arises from the fact that fundamental circunstancies occured through the use of the term „Nachahmung“ in German culture by these theorists, namely the introduction of Greek aesthetics in art by Winckelmann, the acquisition of classical premises of the German poetry by Gottsched and Lenz´s anticipation and foundation of the German literary Realism.en_US
dc.language.isodeen_US
dc.subjectMimesis, Nachahmungstheorienen_US
dc.subjectNachahmungstheorienen_US
dc.titleMimesis - Imitatio - Nachahmung: Nuancen eines Begriffs anhand der Nachahmungstheorien von Winckelmann, Gottsched und Lenzen_US
dc.date.defence2013-08-03
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Germanen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerDr. Fritz Heueren_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerProf. Dr. Gertrud Roeschen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorDr. Judith Sidleren_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. Fritz Heueren_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerProf. Dr. Gertrud Roeschen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorProf. Dr. Hans-Günther Schwarzen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record