Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSykes, Catherine
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-23T12:03:41Z
dc.date.available2011-08-23T12:03:41Z
dc.date.issued2011-08-23
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/14087
dc.description.abstractAnimal welfare has emerged as a pervasive concern in modern international law. The purpose of this study is to situate the international legal principle protecting the welfare of animals within the broader framework of international law. The study uses a constructivist model to develop a theory of the place of animal welfare in the international legal regime that has due regard for cultural differences and the diversity of international society. The historical antecedents for an obligation to protect animal welfare in various global cultures are considered. The argument posits an internationally recognized principle of humane treatment of animals based on a test of necessity, in accordance with which the infliction of suffering on animals can only be justified by balancing means against ends. It proposes that Canadian criminal law on animal cruelty, particularly as it relates to animals raised for food, is inconsistent with this internationally recognized principle.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCruelty to animalsen_US
dc.subjectPublic international lawen_US
dc.subjectAnimal welfareen_US
dc.titleThe Beasts in the Jungle: Animal Welfare in International Lawen_US
dc.contributor.departmentFaculty of Lawen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Lawsen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerN/Aen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorStephen Coughlanen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerHugh Kindreden_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDavid Vanderzwaagen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorVaughan Blacken_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record