Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGong, Xinyu
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-31T18:42:45Z
dc.date.available2021-08-31T18:42:45Z
dc.date.issued2021-08-31T18:42:45Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/80790
dc.description.abstractThis study discusses the reasons that drive the US government to deviate from its private sector-dominated approach and implement state intervention in the competition with China over 5G. In order to better understand the reasons why the US sometimes intervenes in the market to gain a competitive advantage with respect to specific technologies, I examined and compared two case studies: the US response to competition with Japan over semiconductors in the 1980s, and the US response to competition with China over 5G in the 2010s and early 2020s. I argue that first, the US will intervene in the market to secure its technological advantage when it is outcompeted by foreign competitors; second, the US regards China as a strategic adversary, 5G gives China important economic and military advantages, therefore, the US government deviated from the free-market approach in order to maintain its strategic advantage.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectInternational Relationsen_US
dc.subjectChina-US Relationsen_US
dc.subject5Gen_US
dc.subjectState Interventionen_US
dc.title5G and China-US Relations: Competition and Interventionen_US
dc.date.defence2021-08-27
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Political Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinern/aen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorKristin Gooden_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerRuben Zaiottien_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerLeah Sarsonen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorBrian Bowen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record