Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrunet, Tyler David Price
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-07T17:54:08Z
dc.date.available2016-04-07T17:54:08Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-07T17:54:08Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/71363
dc.description.abstractPhylogenetic software and techniques from natural language processing can be applied to the analysis of the structure of academic disciplines. This is possible through a synchronic analysis based on comparisons of the conceptual apparatuses of disciplines, as they are represented in the terminological characteristics of representative discourses. This empirical approach enjoys a superior justificatory status to merely intuitive representations. Finally, this work helps place one of the oldest structuralist problems in the philosophy of science in the scientific context it deserves: ``How should we represent the relationship between disciplines?"en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectDisciplinologyen_US
dc.subjectStructures of Knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectWikipediaen_US
dc.subjectDigital Humanitiesen_US
dc.titleDISCIPLINOLOGY: REPRESENTATIONS OF THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENCE AND THE HUMANITIESen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.date.defence2016-04-01
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Computational Biology and Bioinformaticsen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerNAen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorDr. R. Beikoen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. D. Abramsonen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDr. R. Beikoen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDr. C. Blouinen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorDr. W. Ford Doolittleen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record