Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSteven, Charles
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-03T14:29:42Z
dc.date.available2014-09-03T14:29:42Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-03
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/54069
dc.description.abstractAristotle argues that moral virtue is a kind of habit, and that learning virtue involves a kind of practice and habituation. Some, like Kant, have worried whether this sort of account is really not more than mechanistic training. I argue that this worry is unfounded in Aristotle’s case. Aristotle’s account has otherwise come into favour in recent years as an attractive model for character and moral education. Kant’s ethics have generally seemed less appealing in these areas. Kant argues that the moral law can be known a priori without special experience or education. Whether Kant can have an interesting or attractive account of becoming good is not obvious. Drawing comparisons to the favoured Aristotelian account, and focusing on Kant’s conception of virtue and the highest good, I argue that he can and does.en_US
dc.titlePractice and Enlightenment: Aristotle and Kant on Moral Educationen_US
dc.date.defence2014-08-20
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.degreeMaster of Artsen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinern/aen_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorMichael Hymersen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerKirstin Borgersonen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerDuncan MacIntoshen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorGreg Scherkoskeen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record