Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHarbin, Ami
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-11T11:39:47Z
dc.date.available2012-09-11T11:39:47Z
dc.date.issued2012-09-11
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10222/15492
dc.description.abstractExperiences  of  disorientation can be common and powerful parts of moral agents' lives yet  they  have  not  been  characterized  by  mainstream  Western  philosophers,  and  their   effects  have  not  been  adequately  recognized  by  ethicists.    In  this  dissertation,  I  remedy   these  gaps  by  providing  an  account  of  disorientations  as  multi-­dimensional  experiences   and  by  fleshing  out  a  more  nuanced  analysis  of  disorientation  within  the  framework  of   experienced  agency.    I  argue  that,  contra  the  philosophical  tradition,  disorientations  are   not  always  bad  for  moral  agency.         This  thesis  has  two  main  aims:  first,  to  introduce  a  philosophical  framework  to  clarify   experiences  of  disorientation  and  their  effects;;  and  second,  to  clarify  the  relation  between   disorientation  and  moral  agency,  showing  how  responsible  action  can  both  require  and   produce  disorientation.    In  chapter  one,  I  introduce  disorientations  as  complex   experiences  of  unease,  discomfort,  and  uncertainty  which  vary  in  degree  and  in  effects.     In  chapters  two  to  four,  I  characterize  disorientations  on  three  axes:  corporeal,  affective,   and  epistemological.    I  argue  that  disorientations  always  involve  all  three  dimensions  of   bodily,  emotional,  and  cognitive  experience  and  that  shifts  in  body,  affect,  and   knowledge  can  trigger  experiences  of  disorientation.    I  draw  on  examples  of  how  agents   can  become  disoriented  in  periods  of  illness,  trauma,  grief,  self-­doubt,  and  education.    In   chapter  five,  I  draw  two  lines  of  connection  between  disorientation  and  moral  agency:   experiences  of  disorientation  can  help  us  act  more  responsibly,  and  acting  responsibly   can  be  disorienting.    In  chapter  six,  I  consider  the  political  promise  of  disorientations,   focusing  on  the  way individuals'  disorientations  in  response  to  a  hate  crime  in  their   community  prompted  the  creation  of  less  harmful  norms,  and  thereby  a  better  place  for   individuals  to  live.    In  chapter  seven,  I  conclude  by  outlining  implications  of  my  view  for   how  we  should  face  disorientations  and  what  kinds  of  conditions  should  be  in  place  to   support  those  who  are  disoriented.         Disorientations  do  not  always  enable  moral  agency.    Given  that  moral  philosophers  are   better  versed  in  the  ways  disorientations  can  harm,  my  project  is  to  distinguish  the  ways   they  can  help,  contesting  the  assumption  that  moral  agency  is  always  better  the  more   oriented  we  are.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleDisorienting Responsibilityen_US
dc.date.defence2011-03-18
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.degreeDoctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.external-examinerMargaret Urban Walkeren_US
dc.contributor.graduate-coordinatorMichael Hymersen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-readerGreg Scherkoske, Stephen Boosen_US
dc.contributor.thesis-supervisorSue Campbell, Susan Sherwinen_US
dc.contributor.ethics-approvalNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.manuscriptsNot Applicableen_US
dc.contributor.copyright-releaseNot Applicableen_US
 Find Full text

Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record